Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunado-class tug
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dunado-class tug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Trivial mention in a diagram. Not listed in Janes 2004 and 2015 (although the tug listing there states "The vessels below represent a cross-section of the craft available."; so perhaps exists but also not judged notable enough by Janes.) - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 23:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Transportation, and China. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 23:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, it is not notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 10:07, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 14:37, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.